Antistrategic resistance according to Foucault

 

Per Herngren ©

Start
Civil Disobedience Manual - ebook
Path of Resistance review by David Westby
Postprotest resistance
Vine & Fig Tree Disarmory
Beyond protest-resistance
Nonviolent guidelines
Theory of Resistance
Blog
Protest trapped in transport-metaphor
Antistrategic resistance according to Foucault
How does Foucault use strategic?
Hacktivism & postprotest
Postprotest and Baudrillard
The difference between postprotest and positive resistance
Mass media fabricates noncommunication
Swedish
Spanish - El Camino De La Resistencia
Polish Civil Disobedience Manual
Kurdish Civil Disobedience Manual
Arabic
Contributions


 

 


Contact: perherngren @ post . utfors . se


  

 

 I am working with the notion of antistrategic resistance and found this interesting quote from Michel Foucault:

“If someone ask me what it is I think I am doing, I would answer: if the strategist is a man who says “what importance does a particular death, a particular cry, a particular uprising have in relation to the great necessity of the whole, and of what importance to me is such-and-such a general principle in the specific situation in which we find ourselves?” then it is indifferent to me whether the strategist is a politician, a historian, a revolutionary, someone who supports the Shah or the ayatollah. My theoretical morality is the opposite. It is “antistrategic”: be respectful when singularity rises up, and intransigent when power infringes on the universal.”

Per Herngren

July 19, 2007, version 0.1

 

Source

“Is it useless to revolt?” (Inutile de se soulever?). Quoted here from Foucauldian Reflections. Who quoted from Eribon, Michel Foucault, (pp. 290-91).

Welcome to contribute and reflect on this article!

 

 

Besöksräknare