How does Foucault use strategic?

 

Per Herngren ©

Start
Civil Disobedience Manual - ebook
Path of Resistance review by David Westby
Postprotest resistance
Vine & Fig Tree Disarmory
Beyond protest-resistance
Nonviolent guidelines
Theory of Resistance
Blog
Protest trapped in transport-metaphor
Antistrategic resistance according to Foucault
How does Foucault use strategic?
Hacktivism & postprotest
Postprotest and Baudrillard
The difference between postprotest and positive resistance
Mass media fabricates noncommunication
Swedish
Spanish - El Camino De La Resistencia
Polish Civil Disobedience Manual
Kurdish Civil Disobedience Manual
Arabic
Contributions


 

 


Contact: perherngren @ post . utfors . se


  

 

Undermining the idea that the meaning in a political action is placed somewhere else outside the action in an instrumental reason, and that this “other” meaning defines the value of the action, Foucault regards himself as antistrategic.

In his own texts, though, he is using “strategic” in different ways. Ali Rizvi suggests three distinct meanings of “strategic” in Foucault’s usage:

“1) Strategic as related to the space of freedom. In this sense Foucault contrasts strategic to what he calls “techne.”

2) Strategic in the sense of instrumentalism (explained earlier here).

3) Strategic as belonging to an ethos, certain value system. This belonging is strategic to the extent that one cannot give ultimate justification for it.”

Per Herngren

2007, version 0.11

Welcome to contribute and reflect on this article!

 

 

Besöksräknare